Text-only version. View the full version of this page · All text pages

Protected bike lane retrofit via lane-width reallocation

RFT-CDR-07 Corridor

Protected bike lane retrofit via lane-width reallocation

Installs a physically separated bike lane by narrowing existing travel lanes and reallocating the recovered width, without removing a lane or on-street parking.

Overview

This is the lightest-touch of the three protected bike lane retrofits. AASHTO's Green Book allows narrower vehicle lanes, down to 10 feet, in many contexts, and a four-lane arterial with turn lanes can often be restriped during routine maintenance to include a buffer and a physically separated bike lane without touching lane count or parking at all.1

Related Media

The items below come from outside the Commonway System, external videos, podcasts, and articles related to this page's topic, not part of the guidebook itself.

Aligned

Are Streets Too Complicated Now?

City Beautiful

Asks whether today's proliferation of lines, signals, and lane types on streets is overcomplication or a needed response to modern demands, a question that runs directly through CS's Element-scale catalog and the density-tiered Corridor retrofit paths this video is tagged to.

Aligned

Dutch-style intersection design: bike-friendly

BicycleDutch

Shows the protected-intersection design vocabulary, continuous cycle tracks, corner refuge islands, separated signal phasing, that underpins CS's Protected Intersection pattern and the Corridor retrofit paths built around it.

Where this leads: Target patterns

Bike Highway / Greenway (COL-BHG-04), Default (Standard Collector) (COL-DEF-01) with Protected Bike Lane / Cycle Track (ELM-PBL-37)

Applicability and thresholds

Most applicable where existing lanes are wider than required for safe operation at the corridor's design speed, giving enough recoverable width to build a genuine physical buffer rather than a painted line alone.

Evidence and effectiveness

FHWA identifies planned road diets and similar retrofits of higher-speed roads as prime opportunities to add separated bike lanes, since the same width analysis that supports a lane diet or road diet also identifies the space available for a buffer and protected lane.2

Getting it built

Restriping-based, so it can move through the full construction spectrum starting from paint and flexible delineators at the demonstration or pilot stage, before committing to permanent curb or planter-based separation. See Construction Methodology & The Build Spectrum.

Who can move this

Usually a city or county public works decision, achievable through routine restriping maintenance in many cases. See Legal & Planning Mechanisms.

Protected bike lane retrofit via lane removal (RFT-CDR-08), Protected bike lane retrofit via parking reduction (RFT-CDR-09) (the other two approaches to the same underlying goal, distinguished by where the recovered width comes from)

References

  1. Legal / regulatory AASHTO, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (Green Book), lane width criteria.
  2. Evidence-based Federal Highway Administration, "Separated Bike Lanes," Bicycle and Pedestrian Program.