Search the guidebook

Default (No Parking, No Direct Property Access)

ART-DEF-01
Recommended Arterial

Default (No Parking, No Direct Property Access)

The baseline Arterial: a through-movement road that never mixes on-street parking or direct property access with through traffic. Any access need along the corridor is served by a separate Local or Frontage/Service Road instead.

Typical at: Rural Suburban Compact Urban Core

Undeveloped is an edge case.

#Speed and modal hierarchy

SPEEDLIMIT30SPEEDLIMIT35SPEEDLIMIT40SPEEDLIMIT45SPEEDLIMIT55
Design speed always equals posted speed, following FHWA's self-enforcing roadway framework.2 The baseline is set by density tier, running from 55 mph at Undeveloped and Rural down to 30 mph at Core, matching Collector's own ceiling at that tier. Two modifiers can each subtract 5 mph from the baseline where they apply: adjacency to noise-sensitive land uses within a lane-count-based distance, and local-street access more frequent than a defined spacing threshold, the same access-density logic behind why frequent driveway cuts raise crash risk.3 The two modifiers do not stack: where both apply, only the single larger reduction is used, not both added together. The result never falls below a 30 mph floor except through a documented exception.

#Design notes

The no-parking, no-direct-access rule is the load-bearing distinction between this entry and Stroad. It positions the Commonway System closer to the Dutch functional-homogeneity principle than to conventional NACTO or ITE-CNU practice, where Arterials more commonly do mix through traffic with driveway access and curbside parking.1

Stroad (Commercial Arterial) (ART-STD-05) (explicitly named on this page as the pattern this rule exists to prevent becoming), Default (Standard Collector) (COL-DEF-01) (the equivalent baseline one Functional Classification down)

#Getting there: Retrofit path options

Four-to-three lane road diet (RFT-CDR-01), Five-plus lane reallocation (RFT-CDR-02), Lane diet (RFT-CDR-03), One-way to two-way conversion (RFT-CDR-04), Protected bike lane retrofit via lane removal (RFT-CDR-08)

#References

  1. Precedent-based SWOV, "Principles for a Safe Road Network" (CROW Sustainable Safety).(opens in new tab)
  2. Legal / regulatory FHWA, "Self-Enforcing Roadways: A Guidance Report."(opens in new tab)
  3. Evidence-based Gluck, J., Levinson, H. S., and Stover, V., NCHRP Report 420 (1999).(opens in new tab)

Suggest changes to this page (opens in new tab) Text-only version Last updated September 10, 2026